Don't buy a product based on what the makers think it's for:) Flip video camera versus digital cameras
Usually I don't do "me too" posts and especially against the big named blogs but this reflects my experience with nearly every cheap flash camcorder built to a price. I'm still using a Sony DSC t1 as a camera that can pull 30fps out at VGA level which can be found second hand for circa $120 ( make sure you get the charger and battery and that they are original as that's almost half the price right there. I was looking at the raft of < $200 camcorders and in the end came to the conclusion that there's way too many devices that have video recording as a secondary function that win out over these annoyingly limited devices plus you get a "free" camera or phone in most cases
It's also a good reason for marketers of said multi function products to pay attention to the secondary and tertiary uses of their products and go out their way to highlight them. We know the primary purpose is camera, gee thanks it's expected. We know what cameras do tell us what else is cool ![]()
None of the reviews compared the Flip to it’s core competition: normal digital cameras. Instead everyone focuses on the fact that Flip has sold nearly a million units, saying that’s 15-20% of the camcorder market
- and the Flip is a fraction of the price of most of those competitors.
The Flip v. My Cheap Canon Camera: Flip Loses Across The Board





Comments